Mission Statement:

Nothing is more powerful for your future than being a gatherer of good ideas and information. That’s called doing your homework.

Jim Rohn

P.S.  Since the tags and categories are not always up-to-date, use “search” to look for possibly useful information.

Study finds suppressing emotions can hurt

***********************************************
I have heard the same thing through so many articles and books.  One of the most basic techniques to manage emotional mind is by handling the emotion that needs venting.  The process is easier to talk about than actually put into practice.  I have found it necessary to build one's lifestyle around this principle.  I don't think everyone has enough control over their environment to control the internal emotional flow but is essential to a healthy and productive life both for a person, the community and the organization if any.  The emotions ought to be let out constantly and the level of emotional pressure has to be maintained at the healthy level.  I wonder what percentage of the population of this planet can have such lifestyles.
************************************************
 
July 25, 2009

EUGENE, Ore., Jul 25, 2009 (UPI via COMTEX) — Emotional suppression may cost college freshmen friendships, a co-author of a University of Oregon at Eugene study said Saturday.

"Hiding your emotions is something that is very common but it's something that often is not the right thing to do," Sanjay Srivastava said. "We're not saying never ever do this, but doing it may have negative effects in certain contexts, such as in transitioning into college."

Srivastava, a professor of psychology, said in a press release from the university that suppressing emotions in a new or difficult situation is understandable and may be appropriate, but carrying it too far may result in difficulty trusting and being trusted by others.

The study looked at 278 college freshmen who filled out weekly diaries with data on support received from parents and friends, their closeness with others and social and academic satisfaction. When the term ended, the participants addressed the same topics and the researchers spoke to their friends to determine how they were faring during their first term.

"People who were hiding or masking their emotions were having more difficult times forming close, meaningful, supportive and satisfying relationships," Srivastava said.

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

Book Review: The Brain Wash: A Powerful, All-Natural Program to Protect Your Brain Against Alzheimer’s, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Depression, Parkinson’s, and Other Diseases

The Brain Wash: A Powerful, All-Natural Program to Protect Your Brain Against Alzheimer's, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Depression, Parkinson's, and Other Diseases

I enjoyed reading the BrainWash.  Nutrition books have similar content and if you have read a few good nutrition and prevention books in recent years, the BrainWash will read easily for you.  The overall health is reviewed in terms of the bodily systems and the causes for problems.  The information is very standard but organized in a useful format.  The few pages on how-to apply are very good and will work for most people.  I recommend the book to anyone middle age or beyond.  The BrainWash has too much details so will read slowly for some but the background information is not as important as the sections on how to apply preventive measures.  They can be read fast and time spent on learning to follow the procedure.  This is a  good book to read and a lifesaver. 

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

Damn Interesting: Steely-Eyed Hydronauts of the Mariana

*********************************************** Damn Interesting is a great site with one flaw that finding damn interesting information is harder than imagined thus infrequent posts.  The whole idea of a valley under the ocean being 7 miles deep is fantastic.  Is it really a lifeless area?  If I was an alien from another planet with need of a base on this planet, I would say Challenger Deep rank as one of my top locations.  Then, aliens do not exist and we know that for sure.  What about the 60 people who jumped overboard rather than serve the queen?  

************************************************
from Damn Interesting by Alan Bellows
Challenger crew, 1874

On 21 December 1872, the British naval corvette HMS Challenger sailed from Portsmouth, England on an historic endeavor. Although the sophisticated steam-assisted sailing vessel had been originally constructed as a combat ship, her instruments of war has been recently removed to make room for laboratories, dredging equipment, and measuring apparatuses. She and her crew of 243 sailors and scientists set out on a long, meandering circumnavigation of the globe with orders to catalog the ocean's depth, temperature, salinity, currents, and biology at hundreds of sites–an oceanographic effort far more ambitious than any undertaken before it. For three and a half long, dreary years the crew spent day after day dredging, measuring, and probing the oceans. Although the data they collected was scientifically indispensable, men were driven to madness by the tedium, and some sixty souls ultimately opted to jump ship rather than take yet another depth measurement or temperature reading. One day in 1875, however, as the crew were "sounding" an area near the Mariana Islands in the western Pacific, the sea swallowed an astonishing 4,575 fathoms (about five miles) of measuring line before the sounding weight reached the floor of the ocean. The bedraggled researchers had discovered an undersea valley which would come to be known as the Challenger Deep. Reaching 6.78 miles at its lowest point, it is now know to be the deepest location on the whole of the Earth. The region is of such immense depth that if Mount Everest were to be set on the sea floor at that location, the mighty mountain's peak would still be under more than a mile of water. Nothing was known of what organisms and formations might lurk at such depths. Many scientists of the day were convinced that such crevasses must be lifeless places considering the immense pressure, relative cold, total lack of sunlight, and presumed absence of oxygen. It would be almost a century before a handful of explorers finally resolved to go down there and take a look for themselves.

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

WrittenbyCush Edition Four – July 17 to July 24, 2009

This edition probably will not show the underlying changes I am making but they are taking place.  I am still doing book reviews and critical writing based on worthy articles but also increasing the number.  My choice articles are becoming clearer as a group and over the next few editions should appear as a permanent line of thinking.  I find it hard to rewrite because the volume of the articles is increasing and the ideas are somewhere in the mess.

The book reviews are few.  

I read more books obviously and some always appear in my video and my photo blogs.  I have also made a new blog to collect copies of all my posts.  World of Cush may be the best place to find all of my book reviews in one spot.  My reviews blog also makes an attempt to keep a copy of each.  Starting Your Consulting Business is a very introduction to this vocation.  The Transormation of Cities was a good book but more of a theory text than what I had expected and not as useful as accurate.    How Your Brain Deceives is a great book to read for some of us.  I found it difficult to read mostly because of the style of writing and that I sometimes have a difficult time fast reading works by female authors.  The male writing style usually is straightforward and gets to the point.  The female writing complicates ideas while describing them.  I cannot read slow or re-read because the text is not in my field or that interesting of a read.

The articles are a good bunch for this edition.  Wine and psychology dominate and the articles are better than average.  

I am neither a left nor right brain person and the test given failed me by casting me as left brain.  The descriptions given for dedicated left brain person hardly make any sense if you know me.  Racism can be eliminated according to some and I agree but what is most interesting is the broad definition the article provides for racism.  I really like that viewpoint.  Mine has been weak and not productive.  Social security numbers cannot be protected online which I think is a much bigger problem than most people realize.  I have practiced negative thinking as a practical mean and agree with the article that it can work in some situations.  Beautiful people are now scientifically smarter based on how good looking.  and finally Francis Ford Coppola tells us all.  

I wrote a definition piece of what a sommelier is and no debate exists over the definition but I am confident the profession is misunderstood at least in the US.  The wine business has a chance to learn from the wine drinkers and will not listen as usual.  World's largest appellation comes into existence and amazes us.  I thought the whole point of an appellation was to attempt some control.  The word appellation should show preference for small to achieve more control.  Large appellation should be an oxymoron.  And the $1 million wine book has arrived.  That should give a good idea of the different levels of people involved in the wine business.  It is not just about wine as a drink.  Wine critics are born and made but the article reminds me of a good friend who cannot taste and proves a great theoretical point.  

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

Book Review: A Mind of Its Own: How Your Brain Distorts and Deceives

A Mind of Its Own: How Your Brain Distorts and Deceives
I speed-read A Mind of Its Own and somewhere about 1/3 of the reading I stopped asking myself if the writer was a woman.  I checked the back jacket for her photo as I thought I had seen and yes.  Women can write differently than men which is no surprise since we communicate very differently but the writing and the thought process can be so personalized that speed reading fails the reader.  The thoughts and words are not arranged as a normal writer would and require close attention.  I wish I had the time but I liked what I could read.

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

What Is A Sommelier?

************************************************

This picture is actually a photograph and looks great.  The winery name Merryvale can be seen against the back wall and the link at the bottom can take you to a short blog post about.  However, I picked the photo to make a brief point here.  I actually found a very similar photo in the current issue of Wine Spectator in a full page ad for an airline.  The former cellar is a much larger one with smaller but greater number of barrels.  And my point is?  People involved in the wine business carry many titles.  In the US, the titles are very flexible which means anyone can create or use an existing title unless heavily regulated.  I do not think anyone in the business will get away with calling oneself a Master of Wine or a Master Sommelier if one is not but many call themselves wine director, sommelier, wine director and so on.  A basic question remains of what is a sommelier?  One can find many definition.  The dictionary provides a few leads and the standard resources a few more.  Anyone who has been in the business has some sort of working definition.  Since I have worked as a sommelier and insulted a few last week by comparing a sommelier to a house servant, I feel obligated to clarify the point.  I think a great way to understand what a sommelier does is by understanding the history especially at its best.  The profession of sommelier did not go public until the French Revolution and existed as a high skilled position with an aristocratic household as a private position.  I was given this illustration of the profession a long time ago and still think is one of the best.  If one is to understand the essence of what a sommelier does, you should keep this photo in mind.  The cellar with its many barrels is where sommelier position happened.  Historically, wine was not sold in bottles from famous producers with fancy labels and descriptions.  It was sold in barrels.  The barrel holds the wine while it ages.  The wine changes slowly as it ages.  In a wealthy Old World household, one or more cellars existed on location to house the wines.  The significant thing to remember is the consumption of wine took place in quantities unlike what is seen in the movies with a bottle presented and uncorked for a rich couple dining.  The purchase, storage, care, distribution and the service of wine was fairly complicated.  A typical cellar held many barrels of different wines from various producers.  The vintages and other conditions varied.  Each of these variable factors made the understanding of that wine more complicated.  The process was very subjective and one or more professionals were needed who understood the wine and could manage the ever-changing wine cellar.  This person could tell based on who made the wine, where it was made, when it was made, what was put in the wine, how it was made, the price of the wine and many other factors what the drinker would experience by drinking the beverage.  The final qualification was truly subjective and an art.  If the sommelier could do this properly, he was appreciated as a great skilled servant.  And if not, everything would be off for everyone.  The actual service of the wine blended with food and events making it more complicated.  The sommelier decided which wine for what occasion served at what point of the meal or celebration (occasion).  The sommelier unlike what today people would believe was not the well-dressed polite person helping with wine selection and serving the bottle.  That can be done by a trained wait staff or house servant.  The sommelier is the person who can actually stand in a strange cellar of barrels (not bottles with labels of information) and is qualified to figure the barrels' contents out.  Only a truly qualified and skilled person can achieve this task.  How does one accomplish this?  Every single element that can be taken into consideration can aid.  The more knowledge of the origin and the making of the wine, the better.  The sommelier in the worst possible situation uses one's nose and palate to check the wine.  He (she) ought to be able to tell as much about the wine as if he has a printed sheet of information.  What is the use for such accurate information that a skilled person can acquire blind? He can estimate the price of the wine.  He can tell the varietals and the area.  He can tell the vintage.  He can tell the condition of the wine today and the future.  He can match the wine with food or propose occasions suitable.  He can decide to release the wine, keep it or sell it outright.  Sommelier can do this and great many things more.  How does one become a sommelier?  High skill is developed by study, practice, experiment and most of all learning from a fully qualified person.  The level of knowledge and skill is high and subjective.  Only a body of very qualified peers should determine if a person is at the proper level.  US is built on standards created by the locals for their own benefit.  In other words, the standards are subjective but not qualified by the qualified.  Anyone with some wine knowledge and involvement in the wine business sets one's own standard of who is qualified.  So is a sommelier a high-end wine servant? Historically, he was but the position became part of the not-private world benefiting greater many while surviving the challenges of maintaining standards and traditions, sommelier became a serious profession.  
************************************************


Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

Left brain versus Right brain

************************************************

I have taken tests about left and right brain and the results have consistently been I am right in the middle.  I have no dominant side.  I think it is fair to attribute the state to my parents:  My father was extremely left and my mother was extremely right.  I took the test mentioned on About.com just to satisfy my curiosity.  I have to mention the test does say "for teens" and probably not comprehensive.  I scored Left-brained and I read the description and almost everything is wrong about me.  I pasted the right description at the bottom and that sounds slightly better.  I tell people always not to trust results of research and tests but nobody listens to me.

************************************************

From self-help books to popular television shows, you've probably at least heard of right brain vs. left brain dominance. According to this theory, each side of the brain controls different types of thinking. Additionally, people are said to prefer one type of thinking over the other. A person who is "left-brained" is said to be more logical, analytical and objective, while a person who is "right-brained" is said to be more intuitive, thoughtful and subjective.

The right brain-left brain theory grew out of the work of Roger W. Sperry, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1981. Later research has shown that the brain is not nearly as dichotomous as once thought. For example, recent research has shown that abilities in subjects such as math are actually strongest when both halves of the brain work together.

While often overgeneralized and overstated by popular psychology and self-help texts, understanding your typical behavior can help you develop better ways to learn and study. For example, students who have a difficult time following verbal instructions (often cited as a right-brain characteristic) can benefit from writing down directions and developing better organizational skills.

About.com's Guide to Homework Help, Grace Fleming, has created a fun quiz to help you determine your "brain type" and improve your study habits and academic skills. Take the right brain-left brain quiz to learn more.

***********************************

The Results Are In!You can use these results to help you identify the best ways for you to study effectively. Be sure to find more ways to evaluate your own personality and study skills. It will pay off!

You are a left brain dominant student!

You probably like some order in your life and in the classroom. You are comfortable listening to lectures and taking most test types, but you might be uncomfortable with open-ended essay assignments that require you to imagine scenarios. You want class directions to be clear. A disorganized teacher or unclear assignments will drive you crazy! You are good at analyzing problems to find the right answer. You may have considered pursuing a degree in science or math. You don't like mushy love movies. You might be a Jeopardy champ one day, not because you're smarter than right brain students, but because you are able to answer questions quickly.

******************************

I am more like the following

Do you get bored when teachers lecture too much? Do you feel like you can size up people easily by watching them? If so, you may be right-brain dominant.

Characteristics of Right-Brain Students

  • You take notes but lose them. You may have a hard time keeping track of your research
  • You might have a hard time making up your mind
  • You are good with people
  • You don't fall for practical jokes as easily as some
  • You seem dreamy, but you're really deep in thought
  • People may have told you you're psychic
  • You like to write fiction, draw, or play music 
  • You might be athletic
  • You like mystery stories
  • You take time to ponder and you think there are two sides to every story
  • You may lose track of time
  • You are spontaneous 
  • You’re fun and witty
  • You may find it hard to follow verbal directions
  • You are unpredictable
  • You get lost
  • You are emotional
  • You don't like reading directions
  • You may listen to music while studying
  • You read lying down
  • You may be interested in “the unexplained” 
  • You are philosophical

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

How to Eliminate Racism

***********************************************

Eliminating racism article here is part one of series but makes an interesting point.  I had not thought of racism in terms of elements besides race.  Racism is a common phenomenon worldwide and manifests itself uniquely based on the local culture.  I have always thought prejudice in general is a fascinating subject.  People have strong emotional reactions the general notion of being prejudice but I still find it very interesting.  Humans are animals and animals are terrible creatures.  One can picture humans in sublime state but humans are vicious beats in general.  A wild animal can tear and eat alive another animals without drawing any criticism because that is its nature.  Humans may not eat that way any longer but still operate mentally in a similar way.  Inside most human heads, evil roams 24 hours and our reaction thoughts are no different than a beast tearing another being.  I like the point of the article as far as racism in terms of elements besides race.  That is the exact nature of thought in humans and race is not the only element engaging this terrible thought process.

************************************************

Can psychology help us fight prejudice?

stophateNo doubt, racism is one of the most important evils in our pluralistic, open societies need to confront. And various programs are meant to do so. But what are the odds that these programs will work? Psychology can help us answer this question.

There are roughly two distinct ways to fight against racism. One can attempt to weaken people’s disposition to classify themselves and others into races. The thought goes as follows. Suppose people treat race as they treat eye color—viz. as an irrelevant, superficial, psychologically and morally meaningless physical character. Then, people would not despise, hate, envy, be afraid of, etc., others because of their race. After all, we do not despise, hate, envy, etc., others on the basis of the color of their eyes. 

Alternatively, one can leave people’s disposition to classify themselves and others into races as it is, and attempt to eliminate people’s negative attitudes (such as their negative emotions) toward members of other races. If this approach were to work, people would still view themselves as Black, White, and so on, but they would have no negative attitude toward other individuals qua members of specific races. 

Now, will the attempts of fighting racism that are inspired by these two approaches work? What can psychology tell us about their chances of success? It is fair to say that lawmakers and social activists have ignored the potential contributions of psychology to answering these questions. In this post, I want to make a case for the relevance of psychology with respect to the design of anti-racistprograms. I will first focus on the first way to fight racism, leaving the second one for another occasion. 

So, what does psychology tell us about the attempts to fight against racism by eliminating or weakening our disposition to classify into races? To answer this question, we need to turn toward the research on the nature and evolution of the cognitive mechanisms underlying racial categorization. This is what I will do in the remainder of this post. In my next post (in a week or so), I will explain why it matters to anti-racist programs.

The literature on racial classification is too vast to be reviewed here (see, e.g., Machery and Faucher, 2005b for an overview of what evolutionary have to say on the topic). I will merely present what I take to be the best hypothesis (Machery and Faucher, 2005a). 

Following anthropologist Francisco Gil-White, I have proposed that we evolved a capacity to determine to which cultural group people belong to. We pay attention to cues or markers that indicate people’s affiliation to specific groups. These markers include accents, clothes, behaviors, and maybe subtle physical features; many cultures physically shape the body of their members: think, e.g., about the Padaung Giraffe women, about the split and cut penises in Papua New Guinea, about our own tattoos. 

Why did this system evolve? Well, the idea is that it is important to know whether people belongs to one’s own or to another culture when one undertakes some cooperative ventures with them. In the latter case, they might comply with different norms, have different expectations, etc., which might prevent success.

Now where does racial classification come in? The idea is that our disposition to identify cultural markers and to infer cultural membership misfires. We take various racial properties (skin color, etc.) to be cultural markers and as a result, we draw distinctions between races. Racial classification is thus some kind of accident. We have not evolved to classify into races, but, rather, into cultural groups. And we mistake races for cultural groups. 

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/experiments-in-philosophy/200806/how-eliminate-racism-part-i

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

Region is Not Important; Wine Drinkers Say

***********************************************

This article is of great benefit to people in the wine business.  The most important thing about wine is what the consumers consider it to be not what the marketers wish it to be.  The people involved in the wine business would like to define wine by whatever helps to sell the bottles.  The shape of the bottle? The price? The varietal? The region? The label? The winemaker? The producer? And the list goes on and on.  The consumer has a great deal more than what is accepted by the industry.  The industry pretends to listen to the consumer but also complains without-an-end of how bad the business.  If one would listen to the consumer, the chances are great to find angles helping market the product and move the bottles.  The common wine is to consumer a liquid of some color in a bottle getting transferred to a glass before being drunk.  The consumer cares a great deal less about the details of that liquid than we would like to.  Traditionally and historically that is how the wine has been.  In the Old World, people drank wine of local origins and the current vintage as customary.  A great deal of mediocre and even terrible wine can be drank without any objection.  The modern consumer is not much different.  The wine is only one of the items in a meal and not as incredibly important as the wine business would like to.  The wine business is not about quality wine drinking.  They are most interested in whatever raises the bottle price and the frequency of purchase.  The consumer is about whatever drinks well at the right price.  It should be very easy to understand the few requirements truly attached to the wine by the consumer.  Region is not important should not be a surprise.

************************************************
Rebecca Gibb

Less than half of UK wine drinkers think region is important when they buy wine, a new report says. 

In the Wine and Spirit Trade Association's latest Consumer Intelligence survey, 48% of respondents said that region or origin is important, while 59% said country is important when making the buying decision. 

This will come as no surprise to major producers such as Lindeman's, Blossom Hill and Echo Falls. All are now producing wine in a number of countries under the same brand. 

Clare Griffiths, VP European Consumer Marketing for Constellation Europe said country of origin and regionality were low on the list for Echo Falls consumers. 

'What is important to these consumers is the right taste profile, a recognisable grape variety and an easy drinking wine at the right price,' she added 

The survey also shows promotions are more important than ever. 77% of respondents said discounts like three for £10, or money off deals were very important to their buying decision. This is compared to 61% three years ago. 

The report also showed Pinot Grigio has overtaken Sauvignon Blanc as the UK's second most popular white grape variety. 

Pinot Grigio is experiencing a surge in popularity with 54% of the UK's regular wine drinkers consuming it in the past six months. While Chardonnay maintains its leadership of the UK white wine market, it has lost fans in the past three years. 

Sergio de Luca, director of buying for Italian specialist Enotria, told decanter.com, 'The strength of Pinot Grigio sales, despite euro exchange rate problems and duty increases, demonstrates the flexibility of the grape variety. 

'It shows that the neutrality of this wine makes it easier for consumers to choose it'. 

Wine Intelligence, for the WSTA, surveyed 3,059 regular UK wine drinkers between March and April 2009. 

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

Rest assured that Obama is no socialist

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

World’s Largest Wine Appellation

************************************************

The appellation is 50 times the size of Bordeaux.  I know a wine person named Tom Abruzzini.  He has been in the business forever and once many centuries ago visited every wine region in Italy professionally and studied all the wines around.  He also claims to be the inventor of the Single Vineyard concept.  He claims his idea was copied by the French from the Italians.  I personally do not care much to follow up with the claim but find the point interesting to bottle the produce of a single vineyard by itself for the sake of quality.  The making of quality wine by nature makes the geographical area under the bottle small and even smaller when we refer to blocks or rows of a vineyard.  The world's largest appellation is a great idea commercially but what does it accomplish?  American concept of an appellation is very loose compared to the Old World which is justified because the industry needs to experiment and find what plants best in what soil and weather until someday becomes established enough the laws of the land have to protect the status.  The existing appellation system is too loose to identify wine except for the marketing value attached to a name of a place.  A very large appellation means a very large land of many soils, a huge number of changing climates and other unfriendly elements.  The idea of making a very large appellation is impressive in the news but acts as an oxymoron.  The worlds large and appellation should not be together unless one makes up own definitions for terms as we routinely do here in the US.  The whole benefit of an appellation is in the consistency of specific quality within limits:  Small is the word.

************************************************
David Furer

The USA will soon have the world's largest wine appellation – the 4m hectare Upper Mississippi River Valley AVA. 

Covering 48,142km sq (4.8m ha or 29,914 square miles) over four states, the AVA averages 193km (120 miles) from east to west, 362km (225 miles) from north to south. 

It encompasses some or all of ten counties in Minnesota, nine in Illinois, 18 in Iowa, and 23 in Wisconsin. The northern boundary begins near St Paul, Minnesota in the north to Moline, Illinois in the south. 

The AVA is more than double the size of Wales (20,779km sq), and fifty times greater than Bordeaux (100,000ha or 1000km sq). 

Representatives of the four states involved filed the petition in 2006. It will take effect 22 July 2009. 

Lake Wisconsin, established in 1994, is the only AVA which currently lies within the new UMRV AVA. 

It contains producers of some repute. The Wollersheim Winery of Prairie du Sac, for example, works with a range of grapes including Sangiovese and Bonarda, and has earned some 267 medals over the past 20 years. 

The application for the UMRV AVA was based upon evidence of a glacial retreat 15,000 years ago. 

The resultant water flows combined with the St Croix River and what became Lake Superior to form this bedrock. 

As federal tobacco subsidies have diminished, and wine consumption has risen in the US, many tobacco farmers, especially in Wisconsin, have switched over to growing grapes. 

Due to the abundance of cold and humidity, French and other hybrids dominate the region. 

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

Protecting Social Security numbers online is a futile exercise

************************************************

I once worked for a retail company in Los Angeles and anytime a person clocked in and out, the printed time slip had the social security printed at the top.  I reported it and eventually they disappeared from the printed report.  The underlying assumption at that time was the number had no value.  Anyone could know anybody's social security and it really amounted to nothing.  Today, the world has changed a lot but only a little in some areas.  The social security number is still worthless except on occasion and for the time being SS number is likely to cause more problems than do any good to the owner.  
************************************************

News Tuesday that Social Security numbers may not be as random nor secure as believed is just one more security problem the ubiquitous identification number faces.

Last fall, the Government Accountability Office found that Social Security numbers are under attack and your personal records are more exposed than you’d like to think. At least that seems to be the observation in a frightening study that says among other things that 85% of large counties and 41% of small counties in the U.S. make records that may contain SSNs generally available in bulk or online.

On top of that, many record-keepers do not or cannot restrict the types of entities that can obtain public records and may not know how records are being used. Finish that observation off with the notion that some businesses are sending records with SSNs offshore, primarily to India and the Philippines, even though not much is known about how such data are protected overseas.

The dour Web-based GAO study looked at 247 counties across the U.S. responsible for recording documents — including the 97 largest counties by population and a random sample of 150 of the remaining counties. Records could include birth, death, and marriage records; criminal and civil court case files; and records that reflect property ownership, such as property liens. Some records contain personally identifiable information, such as SSNs, dates of birth, and credit card or bank account numbers.

Alaska, Connecticut, Hawaii, Rhode Island and Vermont were not included in the study because the GAO said individual counties don’t collect personal data in those states.

So, if you have ever wondered how identity theft can be the number one consumer fraud problem seven years running, costing consumers more than $1.2 billion in 2007 alone, and showing no signs of letting up, perhaps we need only look to the results of studies such as this.

Read the rest  http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/070709-social-security-numbers.html?fsrc=netflash-rss

Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

New $1 million wine book to launch in spring

***********************************************

The wine industry has improve greatly and now has outdone itself.  A $1,000,000 price tag and how does it benefit the purchaser? The luxury products fail to have equal intrinsic value to their price tag but justify by the contribution to the size of one's ego.  That is the principle beyond the marketing of such products and frankly nothing is wrong with having such niche and developing to benefit.  However, the normal wine enthusiast either is excited wine can be taken to such level or confused of what wine is supposed to be and appreciated.  
************************************************

Stuart Peskett

A US$1m wine book weighing 30kg is set to be released next year.

The Wine Opus will list the world's top 100 wineries. 

As well as its US$1m (£600,000) price tag, at 30kg (66lbs) it will weigh as much as the average labrador dog (pictured), or a nine-year-old child. 

Related stories: 

  • Dom Perignon's cookbook: only £1000 each
  • Published by Kraken Opus, which has previously launched extravagant works on fashion designer Vivienne Westwood, Indian cricket ace Sachin Tendulkar and Argentine footballer Diego Maradona, it will be released in spring next year. 

    Every purchaser of the book will also receive a six-bottle case of wine from every one of the 100 wineries listed, as well an invitation to visit some of them. 

    Only 100 copies of the book will be made – 25 have already been pre-ordered, with a number of copies set aside for auction. 

    A spokeswoman for Kraken Opus told decanter.com that a 'panel of experts' will draw up a shortlist of about 300 producers, and then a second panel, comprising 40 sommeliers, will make the final selection, based on a 'number of criteria' at a 'wine UN meeting' in London in 2010. 

    A third vote will then be taken to decide the top 10. 

    The list of sommeliers and wine experts has not been revealed, but the spokeswoman said that 'every wine-producing country' will be represented, and that chef Marco Pierre White will be involved in the launch. 

    Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

    Yes, I Suck: Self-Help Through Negative Thinking

    ************************************************

    The never-ending talk about how people behave when told things holds some interesting truths.  One is what I was once told and I have come to believe that whatever people are told they cannot do, they will automatically seek to do.  Human mind sucks.  If you tell people they ought not to stand in the middle of street for a while when crossing it, some people automatically begin doing it on occasion without even seeking a rationale.  The rebellion theory holds some truth but I think there is more to it.  I commented on a blog once when Foie Grae was being boycotted and was booed down for stating that drawing attention only makes the position stronger.  That is how all contraversial efforts have grown over the history.  The more they are opposed the stronger they get and eventually become more legitimate.  That is history of most religions and cults also.  Another thing which is closer to this article is I used to work in retail and when a customer would visit and was offered help the majority would decline automatically because they are programmed to ward off salespeople.  I changed my line instead and would say to a client entering after I had greeted them "You don't need any help, right?" and almost everyone would give me the automatic decline response but 95% of them would process the comment and a second later would say they actually needed help with such and such.  My approach implied they know what they are doing and would not need help now or later.  The ego was being boosted and they would have to lower themselves to admit they needed something or help.  Most people automatically stopped and used the help they needed and were being written off of.  The human mind does many things and a good many of them make no sense.
    ************************************************

    In the past 50 years, people with mental problems have spent untold millions of hours in therapists' offices, and millions more reading self-help books, trying to turn negative thoughts like "I never do anything right" into positive ones like "I can succeed." For many people — including well-educated, highly trained therapists, for whom "cognitive restructuring" is a central goal — the very definition of psychotherapy is the process of changing self-defeating attitudes into constructive ones.

    But was Norman Vincent Peale right? Is there power in positive thinking? A study just published in the journalPsychological Science says trying to get people to think more positively can actually have the opposite effect: it can simply highlight how unhappy they are.(See pictures of people mourning the death of Michael Jackson.)

    The study's authors, Joanne Wood and John Lee of the University of Waterloo and Elaine Perunovic of the University of New Brunswick, begin with a common-sense proposition: when people hear something they don't believe, they are not only often skeptical but adhere even more strongly to their original position. A great deal of psychological research has shown this, but you need look no further than any late-night bar debate you've had with friends: when someone asserts that Sarah Palin is brilliant, or that the Yankees are the best team in baseball, or that Michael Jackson was not a freak, others not only argue the opposing position, but do so with more conviction than they actually hold. We are an argumentative species.

    And so we constantly argue with ourselves. Many of us are reluctant to revise our self-judgment, especially for the better. In 1994, the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology published a paper showing that when people get feedback that they believe is overly positive, they actually feel worse, not better. If you try to tell your dim friend that he has the potential of an Einstein, he won't think he's any smarter; he will probably just disbelieve your contradictory theory, hew more closely to his own self-assessment and, in the end, feel even dumber. In one fascinating 1990s experiment demonstrating this effect — called cognitive dissonance in official terms — a team including psychologist Joel Cooper of Princeton asked participants to write hard-hearted essays opposing funding for the disabled. When these participants were later told they were compassionate, they felt even worse about what they had written.(See how to prevent illness at any age.)

    For the new paper, Wood, Lee and Perunovic measured 68 students on their self-esteem. The students were then asked to write down their thoughts and feelings for four minutes. Every 15 seconds during those four minutes, one randomly assigned group of the students heard a bell. When they heard it, they were supposed to tell themselves, "I am a lovable person."

    Those with low self-esteem — precisely the kind of people who do not respond well to positive feedback but tend to read self-help books or attend therapy sessions encouraging positive thinking — didn't feel better after those 16 bursts of self-affirmation. In fact, their self-evaluations and moods were significantly more negative than those of the people not asked to remind themselves of their lovability.(See pictures of couples in love.)

    This effect can also occur when experiments are more open-ended. The authors cite a 1991 study in which participants were asked to recall either six or 12 examples of instances when they behaved assertively. "Paradoxically," the authors write, "those in the 12-example condition rated themselves as lessassertive than did those in the six-example condition. Participants apparently inferred from their difficulty retrieving 12 examples that they must not be very assertive after all."

    Wood, Lee and Perunovic conclude that unfavorable thoughts about ourselves intrude very easily, especially among those of us with low self-esteem — so easily and so persistently that even when a positive alternative is presented, it just underlines how awful we believe we are.

    The paper provides support for newer forms of psychotherapy that urge people to accept their negative thoughts and feelings rather than try to reject and fight them. In the fighting, we not only often fail but can also make things worse. Mindfulness and meditation techniques, in contrast, can teach people to put their shortcomings into a larger, more realistic perspective. Call it the power of negative thinking.

    http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1909019,00.html?xid=rss-topstories

    Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous

    Book Review: The Transformation of Cities: Urban Theory and Urban Cities (Paperback)

    The Transformation of Cities: Urban Theory and Urban Cities
     
     

    I was excited to read Tranformation of Cities.  I was however not as satisfied after reading because of the theory part.  I didn't expect the book to be about architecture or city layout but expect practical and useful information with good analysis.  Transformation of Cities stays in the theory realm and what practical it offers explores too broadly for my reading sake.  It is a good book overall.

     

    Posted via email from cushsf’s posterous